PAPER B
Committee: AUDIT
AND PERFORMANCE COMMITTEE
Date: 13 MARCH.2007
Title: INTERNAL AUDIT OUTCOMES REPORT
REPORT OF THE
CHIEF INTERNAL AUDITOR
1.
This report is to provide the Committee with a summary of Internal
Audit activity completed since the last outcomes report to the Committee in December
2006.
2.
The Committee is invited to note the contents of the report and to seek
clarification of any issues arising from audits undertaken.
OUTCOMES
3. Whilst this report is to provide the Committee
with information and does not require a decision, the outcome of the report is
to demonstrate to all stakeholders that assurances regarding the Council’s
system of internal control are considered and challenged
at the highest levels within the Council.
BACKGROUND
3.
In keeping with good corporate governance practice, a Committee of
elected members should have oversight of the activities of the Internal Audit
Service for the following purposes:
4.
The Committee should monitor Internal Audit’s performance, both in
terms of the quality and quantity of its work;
5.
The Committee should satisfy itself that Internal Audit has devoted its
attention to the appropriate issues;
6.
The Committee should consider the results of Internal Audit reviews to
ensure that any significant findings are addressed, including control
weaknesses and to ascertain whether, in the opinion of the Chief Internal
Auditor, adequate and satisfactory responses have been given by the Authority’s
management;
7.
The Committee should recommend, if necessary, that further attention
should be given to some of the issues raised;
8.
To facilitate this process, attached as Appendix 1, are reports of
significant audit work completed since the December 2006 report to the Audit
Committee.
STRATEGIC CONTEXT
9.
The work of internal audit services is concerned with providing
assurances that the Council’s system of internal control is adequate and
effective in supporting the delivery of the Council’s strategic objectives. As
such, it makes an important contribution to the Council’s governance
arrangements.
CONSULTATION
10.
The internal audit reports attached as appendix 1 have been subject to
detailed consultation with senior and operational managers within the services
audited. Gaining the commitment of management is an important feature of
Internal Audit’s work. The Committee’s attention will be drawn to those
occasions when agreement cannot be reached on an exception basis.
FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPLICATIONS
11.
There are no direct financial implications arising from this report but
some of the attached audit reports may have identified financial and budgetary
issues needing to be addressed by management.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS
12.
Some of the attached audit reports may have identified legal issues
needing to be addressed by management.
13.
The Council has a statutory duty under the Accounts and Audit
Regulations (amended) 2006 to have an adequate and effective Internal Audit
service in place.
RISK MANAGEMENT
14.
This entire report is concerned with assessing the adequacy and effectiveness
of the Council’s arrangements for controlling risk.
15.
The main risk associated with this reporting process is that unless it
is performed well, it will weaken the effectiveness of the Committee’s work.
BACKGROUND PAPERS
16.
Audit project files held by the Chief Internal Auditor
APPENDICES
17.
Appendix 1 is comprised of Internal Audit Reports on the following
areas:
·
Overall Risk Management Arrangements – Emergency Planning
·
Overall Risk Management Arrangements – The Fire Service.
·
Systems review of the payroll system.
·
Gershon savings review
·
Review of the electronic money transfer system –“Bankline”
·
Leisure centres
·
Review of ICT operations.
Contact point: Ged Richardson, Chief Internal
Auditor, tel: 01983 823683, email: [email protected]
APPENDIX 1
A: OVERALL RISK MANAGEMENT
ARRANGEMENTS – EMERGENCY PLANNING/BUSINESS CONTINUITY 2006/07
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 The
IW Council is committed to embedding Risk Management into its policies and procedures. The recent IW
Council CPA report stated that the Council was “underdeveloped” in relation to
Risk Management. Over a period of two years Audit Services has carried out an
assessment of Risk Management within each Directorate. The intention of this audit is to establish
the extent to which Risk Management has been embedded within the Emergency
Planning & Business Continuity section and to comment on the quality of
Risk Registers produced; the extent to which Risk Management had been cascaded
down within the service, and the actions taken in respect of control measures
identified for individual risks.
2
OBJECTIVE
2.1
To establish the
extent to which Risk Mitigation Strategies have been adopted, implemented and
monitored in respect of risks identified in service risk registers.
3
PROCESS
3.1
The Risk Register
for Emergency Planning & Business Continuity was obtained from the Risk
Management section
3.2
Interviews were
held with the Business Continuity Officer to ascertain the following:
·
How the register
was created,
·
When and how the register was or is to be reviewed
·
Who is
responsible for monitoring individual risks
·
That control
measures identified are being implemented and monitored.
4.
OVERALL CONCLUSION – Emergency
Planning / Business Continuity
Whilst the risks identified by the service appear
relevant and complete there had been no regular review of either emerging risks
nor the effectiveness of the control measures that have been implemented. Since
the draft audit report was issued to management actions have been taken to
update the register for Emergency Planning / Business Continuity.
Partial assurance can be given to management that
risks are being effectively managed by the section.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the staff within
Emergency Planning and Business Continuity, for their assistance in the
completion of this audit.
B:
OVERALL RISK MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS – FIRE & RESCUE SERVICE 2006/07
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 The
IW Council is committed to embedding Risk Management into its policies and procedures. The recent IW
Council CPA report stated that the Council was “underdeveloped” in relation to
Risk Management. Over a period of two years Audit Services has carried out an
assessment of Risk Management within each Directorate. The intention of this audit is to establish
the extent to which Risk Management has been embedded within the Fire &
Rescue Service and to comment on the quality of Risk Registers produced; the
extent to which Risk Management had been cascaded down within the service, and
the actions taken in respect of control measures identified for individual
risks.
2 OBJECTIVE
2.1 To
establish the extent to which Risk Mitigation Strategies have been adopted,
implemented monitored in respect of risks identified in service risk registers.
3 PROCESS
3.1 The
Risk Register for Fire & Rescue was obtained from the Risk Management section
3.2 Interviews were
held with the acting Risk Champion to ascertain the following:
·
How the register
was created, what input was obtained from the Senior Management Team.
·
When and how the register was or is to be reviewed
·
Who is
responsible for monitoring individual risks
·
That control
measures identified are being implemented and monitored.
Interviews were
then held with individual risk owners to:
·
identify
actions taken in respect of stated control measures, and
·
discussions were
held to assess the relevance and accuracy of scores given to individual risks
and the effectiveness of control measures used.
·
Evidence was
obtained to confirm that actions were being carried out
4. OVERALL CONCLUSION – Fire and Rescue
4.1 It is the intention that in future
audits we will be reviewing that;
·
Performance
measures to be in place to evaluate the effectiveness of identified control
measures
·
We will check the
quality of information used in the completion of performance indicators and to
ensure that risk registers are used effectively in the management of the
service.
4.2
Recommendations have been made in respect of the following:
·
The percentage
completed figures in respect of control measures has, in the majority of cases,
not been completed. This should be reviewed as a matter of urgency to ensure
the correct score has been given to each risk and to enable relevant monitoring
of the progress and effectiveness of individual control measures.
·
That progress
made in the implementation of control measures is regularly reported at senior
management meetings.
As part of the audit, testing was undertaken to
confirm the effectiveness of a sample of control measures, two minor
recommendations have been made as a result of our findings.
Within the Fire and Rescue Service the development of
risk registers has been used as an effective management tool and has assisted
service planning ensuring that priority has been given to areas of highest
risk. The Fire and Rescue Service has a good understanding of Risk Management
at senior level. Individual officers had detailed knowledge of their own risks
and understood and agreed with the need for effective Risk Management, however
no evidence could be provided that demonstrated that adequate discussion of
risk was made at senior level meetings.
Partial assurance can be given the risks are being
effectively managed by the service.
5.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
5.1
I would like to take this opportunity to thank the staff within Fire
& Rescue, for their assistance in the completion of this audit.
1.1
The current audit
of the Council’s Payroll Services was carried out as part of the annual Audit
Plan. The Payroll Section carries out the administration of the system and
there have been no significant changes to the system since the last audit
carried out in 2005.
1.2
There are at any
one time between six thousand five hundred and seven thousand live employees on
the payroll. This figure includes some supply staff that may not work every
month and also some outside bodies. Each
month the system pays 6000+ salaries together with the weekly wages, which vary
between 150 and 250 depending upon the season.
2.1
To provide
assurance to management that the internal control framework surrounding Payroll
Services is performing in an adequate and effective manner.
2.2
In accordance
with the “system based auditing control matrices” published by CIPFA standard
tests were conducted on:
New employees
Special deductions from pay
Basic pay
Re-grading
Timesheets (wages)
Overtime
Sick pay
Exception reports
BACS payments
Cheque payments
Inland Revenue returns
Leavers
3.1
We
established 24 key control objectives based upon the above system. Where
appropriate officers were interviewed and tests carried out to confirm that
policies and procedures exist and also that they are complied with, to enable
objectives to be met.
3.2
As one
would expect with a long standing stable system such as this and with a
relatively low turnover of key staff, few problems were found, with 18 of the
key control objectives being found satisfactory. Findings related to the other
6 objectives are as follows.
3.3
A random
selection of ten new employees was chosen and tests carried out to confirm that
new employees are bona fide. Nine of them were correctly dealt with however one
of the ten had been in post for four months and had not produced the required
documentation relating to the right to live and work in the
3.4
A sample
of wages timesheets including overtime claims was selected at random and in the
majority of cases these were checked and found to be satisfactory. However in
one area time sheets were being completed on behalf of the employee by the
authorised signatory, who then certified the timesheets for payment. This does
not comply with the Council’s Financial Procedures as there is no separation of
duties. The employee must complete and sign their own timesheet and overtime
claim and the authorised signatory must then verify the hours claimed and
certify them for payment.
3.5
The vast
majority of staff are paid by BACS and one of the current controls is that the
BACS transmission is limited each month to £7M. This figure was set in May
2004. The most recent payment checked during the audit was March 2006 which was
over £6.5M and consideration should be given to raising this limit to provide
more leeway.
3.6
A few of
the staff are paid by cheque and two issues arose regarding these payments.
When ICT have printed the cheques they are passed back to Creditor Payments but
are not counted to ensure that they tie up with the cheque control register. A
printout is received from Payroll some time later and this is reconciled to the
cheque control register. If there was a discrepancy it would be difficult to
resolve as by the time the list arrives the cheques would have already been
posted. We have therefore recommended that the cheques are counted as soon as
they arrive from ICT and reconciled to the cheque control register.
3.7
The
second issue relating to cheques concerned replacement cheques where the
original was lost, damaged etc. The PIPS system records only the original
cheque number and there is no audit trail to link the replacement cheque to the
original. A course of action has been agreed to provide this link.
3.8
The last
finding related to the small number of people who are paid through the invoice
payroll. If these people are regarded as employees, they may be entitled to
contractual statutory rights such as holiday and redundancy pay and there
position regarding this needs to be investigated. Human Resources are aware of
the issues involved and are currently evaluating the implications.
4
OVERALL CONCLUSION
4.1 Assurance can be given to management that the Council’s Payroll system is operating effectively and that the controls currently in place are sound and operating satisfactorily.
5
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
D. GERSHON SAVINGS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
Introduction
1.1
Gershon savings are
about efficiency, which is not about cuts but is about raising productivity and
enhancing value for money. Efficiency gains accrue when projects:
·
Reduce inputs for
the same outputs
·
Reduce prices for
the same outputs
·
Get greater
outputs or improved quality for the same inputs; or
·
Get more outputs
or improved quality in return for an increase in resources that is
proportionately less than the increase in output or quality.
2
Audit Objectives
·
To give management assurance that adequate
documentation supports the Annual Efficiency Statement (AES) to the Department
for Communities and Local Government (DCLG).
·
To give assurance to management that overall
management arrangements are satisfactory
·
To give assurance to management that efficiency
gains incorporate accepted definitions.
·
To give assurance to management that the Isle of Wight Council is set to achieve the
required efficiency targets as expressed by the DCLG.
·
To give assurance to management that procedures
are evidenced regarding Governance and Scrutiny arrangements in line with best
practice.
3
Significant Findings
· Best Practice has not been followed in that the Leader, Chief Executive and Finance Director must see and approve the statement, and evidence should be available to prove this prior to sending to the Government Department.
4
Overall
Conclusion
Assurance can be given to
management that procedures and controls in place regarding the audit objectives
are satisfactory. The only area of concern relate to those issues raised in the
significant findings.
5
Acknowledgements
We would like to take this
opportunity to thank the programme lead and finance staff for their assistance
in this audit.
1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
A review of the
Council’s Bankline system was carried out as part of the 2006‑07 Audit
Plan. The purpose of this audit is to seek and give assurance to management
that effective controls and procedures are in place to prevent
mis-appropriation of Council funds, and that transactions are carried out in
strict accordance with Council policy.
1.2
The Financial
Services Section is responsible for the administration of this system and there
have been no changes to the system since the last review was carried out in
2005-06.
1.3
Part of Treasury
Management’s role is to temporarily invest surplus funds held in the main
account to recognised financial institutions such as Banks, Building Societies
and Local Authorities to produce the maximum return. The system used for these
transactions is Bankline, which allows instantaneous transference of funds
between accounts.
1.4
Bankline is also
used for other specific types of payment such as:
Foreign payments Precepts as they have to be paid on specific days Payments to
the Inland Revenue Payments to Teachers Pensions Employee pension lump sums
2
SUMMARY OF
FINDINGS
2.1
The Bankline
system is a direct link to the Council’s bankers NatWest (Formerly National
Westminster) The system has been in place for a number of years and is well
established with a sound control framework in place.
2.2
Testing was
carried out to confirm that when temporary advances are made the Treasury
Management’s policies are adhered to. Checks included officer authorisation,
calculation of interest, independent officer checks, reconciliation to bank
statements and repayment of advances and interest back to the relevant codes in
FIDO.
2.3
A random sample
of other payments was tested to confirm that all payments had been checked,
authorised and allocated to the correct cost centres. Payments were checked
back to FIDO.
2.4
The selection of
the institutions used to invest funds in both the short and long term were
examined, including credit rating checks.
This confirmed that the Council is investing in appropriately credit
rated parties and complying with the Treasury Management Strategy.
2.5
Following the
testing we can confirm that the existing control framework is sufficiently
robust.
3
OVERALL
CONCLUSION
3.1
The Bankline
system for the investment of the Council’s surplus funds is well established
with a sound control framework in place. The officers involved in the process
have been in position for a number of years and are fully aware of their
responsibilities. Written procedures are in place and testing confirmed that
these are being followed by staff.
3.2
We are able to
give assurance that the controls and procedures currently in place are
sufficiently robust to acceptably minimise the risk of mis-appropriation of
Council funds.
3.3
There are no
recommendations made.
4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
4.1
I would like to
take this opportunity to thank the Loans and Investment Technician for the
co-operation and assistance in carrying out this review.
F. LEISURE CENTRES & THEATRES AUDIT
2006-07
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
Introduction
1.1
The current audit
of Leisure Centres and Theatres was carried out as part of the 2006-07 Audit
Plan.
1.2
The premises
visited during the audit were:
Medina Theatre
Waterside Pool
Ryde Theatre
Westridge Centre
Shanklin Theatre
1.3
Local Authority
leisure centres throughout the country are subsidised. The Heights, Medina
Leisure Centre and Waterside Pool are compared to other facilities through
benchmarking via the Association for Public Service Excellence (APSE). Facilities of a similar size are grouped
together and performance indicators such as ‘subsidy per head, ‘staff costs’
etc are compared. The facilities on the
1.4
Theatres are also subsidised but to a lesser
degree
2
Summary of Findings
2.1
There is no
separation of duties in the cashing up and banking procedure at Ryde Theatre.
This has been recognised and steps are being taken to ensure a proper
separation of duties is in place in accordance with the council’s financial
procedures.
2.2
All the
establishments have a certain amount of stock such as drinks and confectionery
and the leisure centres also have sports equipment. It is common practise for
the establishments to count stock for re-ordering purposes only with no
reconciliation between actual stocks and stocks sold.
2.3
There were
discrepancies noted between the year end cash certificates and actual monies
held on site in two of the establishments.
The year end certificates in both had not been signed by the on-site
managers.
2.4
Eleven
recommendations have been made, four of which are common to more than one
establishment. The majority of the recommendations are of a minor
administrative nature.
3
Overall Conclusion
3.1
The Leisure
Centres and Theatres are generally operating effectively and offer an extensive
and varied programme to provide interest and opportunities for all groups and
individuals within the community. There is a sound framework of controls in
most areas and the recommendations set out in the attached action plans will
further strengthen this framework.
4
Acknowledgements
4.1
I would like to take this opportunity to thank
all staff involved in the Leisure Facilities and Theatres for their
co-operation and assistance in carrying out this audit.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1
Introduction
1.1
This audit was
carried out as part of the 2006-07 Audit Plan. The purpose of the audit is to
provide assurance to Management that there are adequate controls and procedures
in place to ensure the effective running of the Isle of Wight Council’s IT
Operations function according to best practice as defined by COBIT Version 4.
1.2
The Isle of Wight
Council runs an Active Directory based network with four domains and 3347
users. To provide the services which these users require over 120 distinct
systems are deployed.
1.3
The IT
Infrastructure Team was established in July 2006 as part of the IT Department’s
ongoing ITIL/ITSM* implementation.
1.4
The team is made
up of seven full time staff, one part time and a manager. The Infrastructure
Team are responsible for:
·
Day to day
management of telephony systems.
·
Day to day
management of network and servers.
1.5
The
Infrastructure Supervisor is responsible for leading the implementation of ITIL
within the Infrastructure Team.
1.6
While telecoms
are also covered by the Infrastructure Team there is a dedicated Telecoms
Project Manager currently reporting to the Business Transformation Manager
running a Strategic Telecoms Project. The key objective of the Strategic
Telecoms Project is to realise cost efficiencies, provide business continuity,
identify spend to save initiatives and identify and lead the role out of new
technology across the organisation. The Telecoms Manager works closely with the
Infrastructure Supervisor on a day to day basis. Three members of the
Infrastructure Team have an extensive telecoms background.
1.7
The audit was
carried out by interviewing relevant officers, reference to relevant
documentation and checking for compliance against industry best practice as
defined by version 4 of COBIT the de facto standard for IT Governance
worldwide.
2
Summary
of Significant Findings
2.1
The new Infrastructure Supervisor has inherited a large remit spanning
the work previously covered by three distinct teams. Although
significant work is underway to improve the level of compliance in this area
progress is being hampered by a large backlog of planned work.
2.2
The situation is exacerbated by an over reliance on the skills of
specific individuals, lack of training for key network technologies, lack of
test environments/infrastructure, lack of redundancy for key servers/systems
and a general lack of existing formal procedures and comprehensive inventories
on which to build.
2.3
It is also unfortunate that the formation of this new team has coincided
with a number of key items of network infrastructure either reaching or nearing
capacity leading to frequent performance lag and unscheduled outages forcing
the Infrastructure Team to spend much of their time reacting to issues as and
when they occur rather than carrying out tasks in a planned and structured
manner in order to support operations.
2.4
Key areas which need to be addressed as a matter of urgency:
·
Clearing of backlog to realise benefits of new technologies already
purchased but not yet rolled out.
·
Replacement of network infrastructure at or nearing capacity at a level
to allow for reasonable future growth in demand.
·
Identification of single points of failure in both data and voice
infrastructure. Redundancy to be added where possible or alternative mitigation
strategies to be implemented.
·
Training to be provided for at least two members of the Infrastructure
Team for each key item of network infrastructure.
·
Establishment of a regular planned maintenance window for key items of
infrastructure.
3
Overall
Conclusion
13.1 |
Operations
Procedures and Instructions |
partially
compliant |
13.2 |
Job
Scheduling |
partially
compliant |
13.3 |
IT
Infrastructure Monitoring |
partially
compliant |
13.4 |
Sensitive
Documents and output Devices |
not
compliant |
13.5 |
Preventative
Maintenance for Hardware |
not
compliant |
3.1
With the formal
adoption of an ITIL based approach defining best practice; its ongoing implementation; the adoption of COBIT
as the council’s IT governance framework; the creation of the Infrastructure
Team and the proposals which have already been put forward by the new
Infrastructure Supervisor potentially significant improvements are possible in
a relatively short timeframe. However many of the improvements are reliant on
significant expenditure in order to clear the current backlog of planned work
and provide the network capacity in order to prevent performance degradation
and unplanned outages.
4
Acknowledgements
4.1
I would like to
take this opportunity to thank all staff involved in IT Operations for their
co-operation and assistance in carrying out this review.
· ITIL/ITSM – Information Technology Infrastructure Library is the de-facto standard for Information Technology Service Management. It defines how an effective Information Technology Department should run.